Impact of Tone-Aware Explanations in Recommender Systems

13 citations

Abstract

In recommender systems, explanations are essential for supporting users’ decision-making processes. While many studies have focused on explanation content or user interface, the expression of textual explanations has been largely overlooked. The expression refers to textual styles such as formal or humorous, which we call tone in this article. Although tone contributes to smooth human communication, its impact on users’ perceptions of recommender systems remains largely unexplored. In particular, it is unclear whether the perceived effects of explanation tone differ by domain or user attributes. Therefore, we investigate the effects of explanation tones through two online user studies considering domains and user attributes. In the first study with 470 participants, we generated datasets using a large language model to create fictional items and explanations with six tones across three domains: movies, hotels, and home products. The participants evaluated two explanations for an item, each presented in a different tone, and rated 10 metrics. In the second study with 103 participants, we used a real-world dataset from the hotel domain and incorporated a simple personalized recommender system to examine effects of tone in a more realistic setting. The results revealed that the perceived effects of tones differ by domain and are significantly influenced by user attributes such as age and personality traits. Our findings suggest that appropriately adjusting the tone of explanations according to domains and user attributes can enhance the perceived effects of recommender systems.

13
Citations
Research
Paper Only

Study specs

Two online user studies: (1) 470 participants evaluated synthetic explanations with six tones across three domains (movies, hotels, and home products), (2) 103 participants engaged with a real-world dataset from the hotel domain using a personalized recommender system.

Sample Size
N=573
Study Type
Experimental Study
Year
2025
Human Data Platform
Prolific

Measured Outcomes

The perceived effects of different textual explanation tones on users, examined across domains (movies, hotels, home products) and user attributes (e.g., age, personality traits).

Peer Review & Critical Discussion

3 threads

Potential Selection Bias in 2023 Cohort

DSJDr. Sarah J.
Verified PhD Candidate
12 replies

The participant pool shows a concerning overrepresentation of users from high-income demographics. Looking at Table 3, we can see that 78% of respondents had annual incomes above $75k, which significantly limits the generalizability of these findings to broader populations.

2 hours ago

Non-naive Participants Issue

MCM. Chen (OpenAI)
Data Scientist
8 replies

I've noticed a methodological concern regarding participant naivety. Given that Prolific users often complete multiple studies, there's a real risk that participants had prior exposure to similar experimental paradigms, which could confound the results.

5 hours ago

RLHF Applicability to This Study Design

PRWProf. R. Williams
Verified Researcher
15 replies

The implications for RLHF training pipelines are understated. If we accept the authors' conclusions about preference stability, this has direct consequences for how we should structure reward model training. The temporal decay effect described in Section 4.2 is particularly relevant.

1 day ago

Verify your expertise to join discussion

Create an account and verify your credentials to participate in peer discussions.