Large language models can enhance persuasion through linguistic feature alignment
Abstract
Although large language models (LLMs) are reshaping various aspects of human life, our current understanding of their impacts remains somewhat constrained. Here we investigate the impact of LLMs on human communication, using data on consumer complaints in the financial industry. By employing an AI detection tool on more than 820K complaints gathered by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), we find a sharp increase in the likely use of LLMs shortly after the release of ChatGPT. Moreover, the likely LLM usage was positively correlated with message persuasiveness (i.e., increased likelihood of obtaining relief from financial firms). Computational linguistic analyses suggest that the positive correlation may be explained by LLMs’ enhancement of various linguistic features. Based on the results of these observational studies, we hypothesize that LLM usage may enhance a comprehensive set of linguistic features, increasing message persuasiveness to receivers with heterogeneous linguistic preferences (i.e., linguistic feature alignment). We test this hypothesis in preregistered experiments and find support for it. As an instance of early empirical demonstrations of LLM usage for enhancing persuasion, our research highlights the transformative potential of LLMs in human communication.
Study specs
- Year
- 2024
- Human Data Platform
- Prolific
- Source
- View Source Google Scholar
Peer Review & Critical Discussion
Potential Selection Bias in 2023 Cohort
The participant pool shows a concerning overrepresentation of users from high-income demographics. Looking at Table 3, we can see that 78% of respondents had annual incomes above $75k, which significantly limits the generalizability of these findings to broader populations.
Non-naive Participants Issue
I've noticed a methodological concern regarding participant naivety. Given that Prolific users often complete multiple studies, there's a real risk that participants had prior exposure to similar experimental paradigms, which could confound the results.
RLHF Applicability to This Study Design
The implications for RLHF training pipelines are understated. If we accept the authors' conclusions about preference stability, this has direct consequences for how we should structure reward model training. The temporal decay effect described in Section 4.2 is particularly relevant.
Verify your expertise to join discussion
Create an account and verify your credentials to participate in peer discussions.