Crowdsourcing Platforms: Research Area — Prolific Citations Library

Discover 4 peer-reviewed studies in Crowdsourcing Platforms (2021–2025). Explore research findings powered by Prolific's diverse participant panel.

This page lists 4 peer-reviewed papers in the research area of Crowdsourcing Platforms in the Prolific Citations Library, a curated collection of research powered by high-quality human data from Prolific.

Papers (4 of 4)

Reflection-Philosophy Order Effects and Correlations Across Samples

Authors: N Byrd

Year: 2025

Published in: Byrd, N. (2025). Reflection-Philosophy Order Effects and Correlations Across Samples. Analysis. DOI: 10.1093/analys/anaf015. https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/y8sdm

Institution: Stevens Institute of Technology

Research Area: Behavioral Research Methods, Experimental Psychology, Crowdsourcing Platforms

Discipline: Psychology

Reflective reasoning correlates with certain philosophical decisions, and the study suggests bidirectional causal paths between reflection and philosophy, with test order effects influencing reflection test outcomes but not philosophical decisions.

Methods: Participants from four sources (Amazon Mechanical Turk, CloudResearch, Prolific, and a university) were tested on reflective reasoning and their decisions on 10 philosophical thought experiments.

Key Findings: Impact of reflective reasoning on philosophical decisions and the effect of test order on reflection and philosophy outcomes.

Citations: 4
Recruiting older adult participants through crowdsourcing platforms: Mechanical Turk versus Prolific Academic

Authors: AM Turner, T Engelsma, JO Taylor

Year: 2022

Published in: AMIA annual ..., 2021 - pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov

Institution: NiH

Research Area: Crowdsourcing Platforms, Participant Recruitment

Discipline: Behavioral Research, Gerontology

Citations: 105
Software engineering user study recruitment on Prolific: An experience report

Authors: B Reid, M Wagner, M d'Amorim, C Treude

Year: 2022

Published in: arXiv preprint arXiv ..., 2022 - arxiv.org

Institution: University of Sydney, Queen's University, University of Victoria, University of Calgary

Research Area: Software Engineering User Studies, Crowdsourcing Platforms (Prolific)

Discipline: Software Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)

Citations: 35
Reply to MTurk, Prolific or panels? Choosing the right audience for online research

Authors: L Litman, A Moss, C Rosenzweig

Year: 2021

Published in: Choosing the right ..., 2021 - papers.ssrn.com

Institution: Prolific

Research Area: Online Research Methods, Crowdsourcing Platforms, Data Quality, Participant Recruitment

Discipline: Computational Social Science, Behavioral Research Methods

Citations: 133