Authors: P. Schoenegger, F. Salvi, J. Liu, X. Nan, R. Debnath, B. Fasolo, E. Leivada, G. Recchia, F. Günther, A. Zarifhonarvar, J. Kwon, Z. Ul Islam, M. Dehnert, D. Y. H. Lee, M. G. Reinecke, D. G. Kamper, M. Kobaş, A. Sandford, J. Kgomo, L. Hewitt, S. Kapoor, K. Oktar, E. E. Kucuk, B. Feng, C. R. Jones, I. Gainsburg, S. Olschewski, N. Heinzelmann, F. Cruz, B. M. Tappin, T. Ma, P. S. Park, R. Onyonka, A. Hjorth, P. Slattery, Q. Zeng, L. Finke, I. Grossmann, A. Salatiello, E. Karger
Year: 2025
Published in: arXiv preprint arXiv ..., 2025 - arxiv.org
Institution: London School of Economics and Political Science, University of Cambridge, University College London, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Oxford, Modulo Research, Stanford University, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, ETH Zürich, University of Johannesburg
Research Area: Natural Language Processing
Discipline: Social Science, Artificial Intelligence
This paper compares a frontier LLM (Claude Sonnet 3.5) against incentivized human persuaders in a conversational quiz setting, finding that the AI's persuasion capabilities surpass those of humans with real-money bonuses tied to performance.
Citations: 16
