Browse 7 peer-reviewed papers from University Of Edinburgh spanning Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Digital Health (2020–2025). Research powered by Prolific's high-quality participant data.
This page lists 7 peer-reviewed papers from researchers at University Of Edinburgh in the Prolific Citations Library, a curated collection of research powered by high-quality human data from Prolific.
-
Authors: N Tyulina, Y Yu, TA Emmanouil, SI Levitan
Year: 2025
Published in: Proceedings of the 7th ACM ..., 2025 - dl.acm.org
Institution: University of Cambridge, University of Bath, University of Edinburgh, New York University
Research Area: Human-AI Interaction, Trust and Perception, Nonverbal Communication
Discipline: Applied Linguistics
Trust judgments are primarily influenced by auditory cues in both humans and multimodal models, though subtle differences in modality weighting exist between them.
Methods: Behavioral experiment with trust ratings of bimodal stimuli across four trust congruence conditions, combined with a multimodal model trained using HuBERT and ResNet-50 with late fusion, analyzed using Permutation Feature Importance (PFI).
Key Findings: The construction of trust from visual and auditory signals in both humans and multimodal models, focusing on modality dominance and feature weighting.
Sample Size: 150
-
Authors: S Valentin, S Kleinegesse, NR Bramley, P Seriès
Year: 2024
Published in: Elife, 2024 - elifesciences.org
Institution: University of Edinburgh, University of Cambridge
Research Area: Bayesian Optimal Experimental Design (BOED) in Behavioral Research
Discipline: Artificial Intelligence, Psychology
The paper presents a tutorial on using Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED) and machine learning to design experiments that efficiently test and evaluate cognitive models, validated via simulations and a real-world case study of exploration-exploitation decision-making.
Methods: The paper employs Bayesian optimal experimental design (BOED) coupled with machine learning to identify optimal experimental configurations. Simulations and a real-world multi-armed bandit experiment are used for validation.
Key Findings: The capacity of BOED to distinguish between cognitive models, parameters explaining human behavior, and how people balance exploration and exploitation.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.86224
Citations: 15
-
Authors: Eddie L. Ungless, Nina Markl, Björn Ross
Year: 2024
Published in: ArXiv
Institution: University of Edinburgh, University of Essex
Research Area: Computational Social Science, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Media Studies
Discipline: Computational Social Science
-
Authors: T Hosking, P Blunsom, M Bartolo
Year: 2023
Published in: arXiv preprint arXiv:2309.16349, 2023 - arxiv.org
Institution: Cohere, University of Edinburgh, University College London
Research Area: LLM Evaluation, Limitations of Human Preference Scores, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) in AI Training
Discipline: Artificial Intelligence
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2309.16349
Citations: 72
-
Authors: MC Whatnall, KZ Kolokotroni, TE Fozard
Year: 2023
Published in: The American Journal of ..., 2023 - Elsevier
Institution: The University of Sheffield, The University of Edinburgh
Research Area: Public Health, Behavioral Science, Digital Health
Discipline: Clinical Nutrition, Public Health, Behavioral Science
Citations: 4
-
Authors: C Woodcock, B Mittelstadt, D Busbridge
Year: 2021
Published in: Journal of medical Internet ..., 2021 - jmir.org
Institution: Oxford University, Alan Turing Institute, University of Edinburgh
Research Area: Health Informatics, Explainable AI (XAI), Trust in AI, Digital Health
Discipline: Digital Health
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2196/29386
Citations: 52
-
Authors: A Ladak, J Harris, JR Anthis
Year: 2020
Published in: Proceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference ..., 2024 - dl.acm.org
Institution: University of Cambridge, University of Bath, University of Edinburgh
Research Area: Moral consideration of AI, Conjoint Experiment, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Psychology
Discipline: Human-Computer Interaction (HCI)
DOI: 10.1145/3613904.3642403
Citations: 16