Browse 5 peer-reviewed papers from University Of Florida spanning Computational Social Science, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) (2019–2025). Research powered by Prolific's high-quality participant data.
This page lists 5 peer-reviewed papers from researchers at University Of Florida in the Prolific Citations Library, a curated collection of research powered by high-quality human data from Prolific.
-
Authors: Y Ding, J You, TK Machulla, J Jacobs, P Sen
Year: 2025
Published in: Proceedings of the ..., 2022 - dl.acm.org
Institution: University of California Irvine, University of Florida, State University of New York at Buffalo, University of Waterloo, Virginia Tech
Research Area: Computational Social Science, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI), Sentiment Analysis
Discipline: Computational Social Science
Demographic differences among annotators significantly affect sentiment dataset labels, causing up to a 4.5% accuracy difference in sentiment prediction models.
Methods: Crowdsourced annotations from >1000 workers combined with demographic data; analysis of multimodal sentiment datasets and evaluation using machine learning models.
Key Findings: Impact of annotator demographics on sentiment labeling and its effect on model predictions.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3555632
Citations: 28
Sample Size: 1000
-
Authors: K Warren, T Tucker, A Crowder, D Olszewski
Year: 2024
Published in: Proceedings of the ..., 2024 - dl.acm.org
Institution: University of Florida
Research Area: Audio Deepfake Detection, Human Factors in AI Security, Perceptual Studies, AI Security
Discipline: Computer Science
Humans outperform machine learning models in classifying real human audio versus deepfakes, but are often misled by preconceptions about generated content, highlighting the need for more synergistic approaches between human and machine decision-making.
Methods: A large-scale user study was conducted where over 1,200 participants evaluated audio samples from three widely-cited deepfake datasets. Performance was quantitatively measured and thematic analysis was used to explore user reasoning and differences from machine classification.
Key Findings: Comparison of human and machine classification performance on audio deepfake detection, analysis of user reasoning, and evaluation of error patterns between both humans and models.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/3658644.3670325
Citations: 14
Sample Size: 1200
-
Authors: BD Douglas, PJ Ewell, M Brauer
Year: 2023
Published in: Plos one, 2023 - journals.plos.org
Institution: University of Alabama, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Florida Atlantic University
Research Area: Social Science Research Methods, Behavioral Research, Data Quality in Crowdsourcing
Discipline: Social Science Research Methods
Citations: 1598
-
Authors: RZ Zhang, EJ Kyung, C Longoni, L Cian, K Mrkva
Year: 2022
Published in: Cognition, 2025 - Elsevier
Institution: The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, China Europe International Business School, University of South Florida, HEC Paris, University of Mannheim
Research Area: Social Psychology, Behavioral Science, Prosocial Behavior, AI Ethics.
Discipline: Social Psychology, Behavioral Science
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2024.105937
Citations: 13
-
Authors: SA Wright, JK Goodman
Year: 2019
Published in: Handbook of research methods in ..., 2019 - taylorfrancis.com
Institution: University of Central Florida, University of Richmond
Research Area: Consumer Research, Crowdsourcing, Marketing Academia
Discipline: Marketing, Consumer Behavior
Citations: 22