Discover 5 peer-reviewed studies in Benchmarking (2024–2025). Explore research findings powered by Prolific's diverse participant panel.
This page lists 5 peer-reviewed papers in the research area of Benchmarking in the Prolific Citations Library, a curated collection of research powered by high-quality human data from Prolific.
-
Authors: L Ibrahim, C Akbulut, R Elasmar, C Rastogi, M Kahng, MR Morris, KR McKee, V Rieser, M Shanahan, L Weidinger
Year: 2025
Published in: arXiv preprint arXiv:2502.07077, 2025•arxiv.org
Institution: Google DeepMind, Google, University of Oxford
Research Area: Multimodal conversational AI, conversational AI, Evaluation methodology, benchmarking
Discipline: Computer Science, Natural Language Processing (NLP), Human–Computer Interaction (HCI)
The paper evaluates anthropomorphic behaviors in SOTA LLMs through a multi-turn methodology, showing that such behaviors, including empathy and relationship-building, predominantly emerge after multiple interactions and influence user perceptions.
Methods: Multi-turn evaluation of 14 anthropomorphic behaviors using simulations of user interactions, validated by a large-scale human subject study.
Key Findings: Anthropomorphic behaviors in large language models, including relationship-building and pronoun usage, and their perception by users.
Citations: 26
Sample Size: 1101
-
Authors: A Warrier, D Nguyen, M Naim, M Jain, Y Liang, K Schroeder, C Yang, JB Tenenbaum, S Vollmer, K Ellis, Z Tavares
Year: 2025
Published in: 2025 - arXiv preprint arXiv …, 2025 - arxiv.org
Institution: Basis Research Institute, DFKI GmbH, Harvard University, Quebec AI Institute, University of Cambridge, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cornell University
Research Area: Agent learning, World Models, Benchmarking, Evaluation protocols, RLHF, LLM
Discipline: Computer Science, Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning
The paper introduces WorldTest, a novel protocol for evaluating model-learning agents using reward-free exploration and behavior-based scoring, and demonstrates that humans outperform models on the AutumnBench suite of tasks, revealing significant gaps in world-model learning.
Methods: The authors proposed WorldTest, a protocol separating reward-free interaction from scored tests in related environments, with evaluations done using AutumnBench—a dataset of 43 grid-world environments and 129 tasks across prediction, planning, and causal dynamics.
Key Findings: Performance of model-learning agents and humans in acquiring world models for masked-frame prediction, planning, and understanding causal dynamics.
Citations: 1
Sample Size: 517
-
Authors: D Testa, G Bonetta, R Bernardi, A Bondielli
Year: 2025
Published in: arXiv preprint arXiv ..., 2025 - arxiv.org
Institution: Università di Roma La Sapienza
Research Area: Multimodal Reasoning, AI Benchmarking
Discipline: Artificial Intelligence
MAIA is a benchmark designed to evaluate the reasoning abilities of Vision Language Models (VLMs) on video-based tasks, with a focus on Italian culture and language, revealing their fragility in consistency and visually grounded language comprehension and generation.
Methods: MAIA comprises a set of video-related questions tested with two tasks: visual statement verification and open-ended visual question answering, categorized into twelve reasoning types to disentangle language-vision relations.
Key Findings: The ability of Vision Language Models (VLMs) to perform consistent, visually grounded natural language understanding and generation across fine-grained reasoning categories.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2502.16989
-
Authors: N Meister
Year: 2024
Published in: ArXiv
Institution: Stanford University
Research Area: Distributional Alignment of LLMs, LLM Benchmarking, AI Robustness, AI Fairness, AI Bias
Discipline: Artificial Intelligence
-
Authors: SN Pushpita, R Levy
Year: 2024
Published in: Proceedings of the 28th Conference on ..., 2024 - aclanthology.org
Institution: Masachusetts Institute of Technology
Research Area: Visual Language Models (VLMs), Psycholinguistics, Psychometric Benchmarking
Discipline: Artificial Intelligence
DOI: https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/2024.conll-1.34