Explore 4 peer-reviewed papers in Organizational Behavior (2024–2026). Academic research using Prolific for high-quality human data collection.
This page lists 4 peer-reviewed papers in the discipline of Organizational Behavior in the Prolific Citations Library, a curated collection of research powered by high-quality human data from Prolific.
-
Authors: H Zhu, J Chen, N Liu
Year: 2026
Published in: International Journal of Hospitality Management, 2026 - Elsevier
Institution: Sun Yat-Sen University
Research Area: Leadership studies, Organizational psychology, hospitality research, Attachment theory
Discipline: Organizational Behavior, Management
Leader secure-base support improves hospitality employees’ service performance by boosting work engagement, but this benefit is weakened when employees experience high role ambiguity or role conflict.
-
Authors: J Goergen, E de Bellis, AK Klesse
Year: 2025
Published in: ... of the National Academy of Sciences, 2025 - pnas.org
Institution: Cologne Business School, Maastricht University School of Business and Economics, Tilburg University, Copenhagen Business School
Research Area: Psychology of AI and Organizational Behavior
Discipline: Organizational Behavior, Psychology of AI
AI assessments lead people to emphasize analytical characteristics in their self-presentation, which could change hiring outcomes and compromise assessment validity.
Methods: Examined behaviors in candidate selection contexts to assess how people adapt their self-presentation under AI evaluation.
Key Findings: Changes in self-presentation and perceived traits emphasized during AI assessments compared to traditional evaluations.
Citations: 4
-
Authors: L Lanz, R Briker, FH Gerpott
Year: 2024
Published in: Journal of Business Ethics, 2024 - Springer
Institution: University of Lausanne, University of Neuchâtel, University of Bern
Research Area: AI Ethics, Organizational Behavior, Supervisory Influence in the Workplace
Discipline: Business Ethics, Organizational Behavior, Artificial Intelligence Ethics
Employees are less likely to adhere to unethical instructions from AI supervisors compared to human supervisors, partly due to perceived differences in 'mind' and individual characteristics like compliance tendency and age.
Methods: The study employed four experiments using causal forest and transformer-based machine learning algorithms, as well as pre-registered experimental manipulations to evaluate employee behavior towards unethical instructions from AI and human supervisors.
Key Findings: Adherence to unethical instructions from AI versus human supervisors; mediating role of perceived mind and moderating factors like compliance tendency and age.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-023-05393-1
Citations: 72
Sample Size: 1701
-
Authors: N Jabagi, AM Croteau, LK Audebrand
Year: 2024
Published in: ... International Journal of ..., 2025 - Taylor & Francis
Institution: Concordia University, John Molson School of Business
Research Area: Organizational Behavior, Human Resources, Algorithmic Fairness in the Gig Economy
Discipline: Organizational Behavior, Human Resources
DOI: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585192.2024.2441448#
Citations: 12